Ermm…that’s why I used it as an example of something plausible…
God, God’s will and intent as opposed to mechanistic agencies.
And evidence is evaluated for its plausibility and plausibility depends on the worldview and naturalism is a worldview.
You’re asking me - as a believer that nature can be explained naturally - for evidence of non-natural agency? Can’t you see! Whatever is shown to you will always be interpreted as having a natural explanation so of course if that’s one’s worldview then they never will accept evidence for the supernatural, you CHOOSE to interpret everything you experience within the naturalism worldview.