All children are innocent, it would be sadistic and amoral to think otherwise. Like the deity depicted in the bible for example, which tortured a newborn baby for 7 days until it died.
I don’t believe it is possible, and I also find the concept nauseatingly immoral, and the idea that it is ever moral under any circumstances for a deity with limitless power and knowledge, and therefore choice, to cause or even allow, a child to be tortured with something like cancer, is sadistic and irrational nonsense. Since such a deity could not rationally be asserted as omnibenevolent. It is a rational contradiction to claim a deity with limitless power, knowledge, and benevolence exists in a world with ubiquitous suffering, even if you create sadistic fantasies that try to justify torturing children, and their loved ones.
More importantly you’ve not addressed the innate contradiction of an omnibenevolent deity causing or allowing suffering at all. You’ve just waved it away with a new unevidenced fantasy, that still contains that contradiction anyway. A contradiction which you clearly have failed to understand.
Except that’s a sick fantasy you created, and while it’s clear you think it’s sound reasoning to wave away rational objections to your fantasies, by doubling down with new fantasies, it demonstrably isn’t, to anyone who has even a tenuous grasp of informal logic.
I don’t believe you, and endlessly repeating that bare claim is not a sound reason to change that position. Your asinine triangle analogy is condescending garbage, we know what a fucking contradiction is. You apparently do not, judging from nauseating assertion that implies torturing children would be ok, if they existed before and behaved wickedly as adults in that life.
Since you have ignored multiple posters, pointing out your use of known logical fallacies in the past, that’s pretty fucking hilarious. Rational means adhering to principles of logic, one the most basic principles of logic, is that nothing can be asserted as rational if it uses or contains a known logical fallacy. You have on numerous occasions simply ignored or denied your use of these in the past.
This ludicrously vague deepity doesn’t lend any credence to your superstitious beliefs. It just shows you understand less about objective methods like the scientific method, than you do about logic. However decrying those methods doesn’t remotely evidence anything.
You have violated a basic principle of logic by using known common logical fallacies, many times on here.
That’s a false equivalence fallacy. Rational simply means in adherence with the principles of logic. Your arbitrary and subjective objections are redundant nonsense, they don’t have any specific meaning or tell us anything about what is being argued.
Your posts are clearly more about ego and emotion than reason, and indicate that you don’t have even the most basic grasp of logic or its principles. Your posts are barely comprehensible half the time, they’re overly verbose, painfully condescending, arrogantly assumption, and often just plain wrong.
