More fucking bullshit from studentfinalpaper
He has just been sitting back waiting for some atheist to make a silly response,
@CarrieB!
Your objections have nothing at all to do with the premise of the argument. The Kalam gets you noplace near a
Premise one asserts that “Everything that began to exist has a cause.”
Premise two: “The universe began to exist.”
-
Premise one appears logical within our current universal reference; however, physics as we know it breaks down at Planck Time… Asserting anything beyond the singularity to which our physics has currently take us is BULLSHIT. The attributes of the cosmose, that into which our universe appears to be expanding and beyond, is completely unknown to us and beyond Planck Time.
-
The universe began to exist from what? It had an origin in that it began to expand, Talking about “before time” or “before space” is completely senseless. There is no time or space if there is no time or space, so what in the fuck is the OP referencing. Please demonstrate this timeless, space-less existence. The position is irrational and childish,
-
The conclusion: “The Universe began to exist” is agreed upon by many who study the subject, at the same time there are emerging theories that attempt to expand the Big Bang theory. Science begins at the Big Bang - (At that point which the universe began to expand.) Nothing empirically demonstrable has been yet asserted about the universe prior to Planck Time.
The OP is a dishonest troll who ignores facts and continues repeating himself over and over as he waits for atheists who do not understand the Kalam so he can convince himself that his inane bullshit holds water. It does not!