Pro-Birth Not really “Pro-life”

Ohhh - feeling frisky this morning :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:. Had enough of a politician catering to the religious right on abortion …
Usually I keep my mouth shut BUT fuck!!! this one couldn’t slide…

So after commenting that it’d be nice if they paid “child support” first LOL and got a bunch of “likes” …
I got this :partying_face:

Hey my middle pic should be “ 1st” and the first one after … the 3rd is OK. Sorry :neutral_face:

1 Like


Well done, they’re not pro life, they’re anti choice. I mean it’s not as if anyone is telling them whether they can have an abortion or not.

Yah. I hit a hornets :honeybee: nest OohhhWeeeee tied a bunch of panties in a knot :partying_face: Last
Post as it’s Facebook and I don’t give a shit

1 Like


Well done again. Do you notice every time you challenge their rhetoric on abortion, that they always double down with worse rhetoric. Note how those who are pro choice for instance, are always misrepresented as “in favour of” or somehow “advocating” abortion. The only thing I am in favour of is a woman have the ultimate choice of what happens to her own body. I also reject the idea we should give rights to an insentient blastocyst we would not offer a fully formed and sentient human being, that can experience emotional and physical pain, especially where the rights bestowed on that insentient clump of cells, would directly negate the rights of the woman whose body it was in, that’s absurdly immoral to me.


Individuals have a moral right to decide what to do with their own bodies…within the law. Not to mention the right of each individual women to achieve their full potential…or…to define gender equality…or…to point out overall, the religious based misogynistic view of woman as solely a vessel for procreation, as opposed to a living breathing woman with individual thoughts, rights and freedoms.

The people you debate, have beliefs that suppress basic rights, through what they perceive as religious freedom.

The beauty of medical science is that same “growing cell grouping” can be “saved” and allowed to grow and flourish outside the womb if the woman (parents) choose AND want the baby… at earlier stages of “development”.

I like choice. I leave it up to medical science and ethical committees to set guidelines/regulations as to when that life can be or should be terminated (tubal “pregnancy”) and work with the person/people involved that are going through a difficult decision making process.

Some theists (specific group above) believe the woman is ordering a Big Mac at McDonald’s…( ***shhhccchhh hello, I’d like to order an abortion …)


My wife gets the big mac a few times a week.

And now the after-birth…

True experience…first boy swallows quarter - take him to emergency, get x rays, etc.

Second boy :boy: swallows quarter - I tell him
“It’ll pass” (and watch for it)

Third boy :boy: swallows quarter-“That’s coming out of your allowance!”


I found this online, and I believe someone posted this in an abortion debate in the old forum.

Posed by Science fiction author and journalist Patrick S. Tomlinson. It is aimed at anti choicers who try to claim that life starts at the moment of conception, and thus an embryo has the same value as a child.

You’re in a fertility clinic when the fire alarm goes off. Before you escape, you have the option to save either a five-year-old child who is pleading for help, or a container of 1000 viable human embryos.

You can either:

A) Save the child.
B) Save the thousand embryos?

There is no ‘C.’ ‘C’ means you all die.

(Man's viral pro-choice question 'shuts down' the anti-abortion argument | The Independent | The Independent)

I also liked the placard in the image at the top that said: “keep your rosaries off my ovaries”, :smile:

My question is WHY the fuck is science holding onto viable embryos???

I mean - don’t “we hold a position” that is “anti-life”…right!!!

Why the fuck are we helping couples have children when they can adopt all the unwanted ones …huh???

Stupid fuckin activist bible thumping shithead unreasonable black/white ‘thinking’ (loose term use) head up their ass … etc

1 Like

So with my grumbling mood :angry: I went and kicked the hornets :honeybee: nest again! I just copy & pasted my post to here

“ I use google to get to the Gatway Bible online…

Numbers 5:11-31 (read it all)

“and if feelings of jealousy come over her husband and he suspects his wife and she is impure”

“then he is to take his wife to the priest. “

“‘The priest shall bring her and have her stand before the Lord. 17 Then he shall take some holy water in a clay jar and put some dust from the tabernacle floor into the water.“

“if you have gone astray(M) while married to your husband and you have made yourself impure by having sexual relations with a man other than your husband”— 21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse(N)—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[b] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell.”

The Lord will abort the fetus.

Pretty straight forward… oh, and “she didn’t get a choice” in the matter - her husband did. And if he was wrong…she shouldn’t have made him “jealous” to begin with - “The priest is to have her stand before the Lord and is to apply this entire law to her. 31 The husband will be innocent of any wrongdoing, but the woman will bear the consequences of her sin.’”

Is Jesus god? Did god write the law? Was the law given so there was some measure that man was sinful (couldn’t live up to every part of law)? Did Jesus come to fulfill law and save from sin?

LOL - god doesn’t “care” about living outside of womb kids…what made you think he cared about them inside it?

Leave this matter to the women and her doctors.”

Edited to add:
How do I put stuff in a box??? Like you did Sheldon ?


Still finding my way around. So will answer your question about targeted replies.

Notice this post is aimed at Whitefire13, not just Whitefire. I typed in Whitefire and got a bubble with your full screen name. Left clicked on that.

Don’t know where else to put this; still can’t post from my PC. It won’t scroll down to find the reply button.

Have not been able to change the screen name,.

Well… it’s finishing up… last 2 Pics for those that enjoy this sort of thing :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

This little nugget is gonna sit somewhere in her brain :brain: and fuck with her synapses.

Have you tried using a different browser (Firefox, Chrome, something like that)?

Ok first if you highlight & copy some text from a post you are replying to, when you hit reply it is automatically quoted with the posters username and avatar as above…

You can highlight text in your own post then click on the inverted commas, and it will block quote that text, as I have done here.

How about using a phone??? That’s all I use

Yeah it works fine, just highlighted the text from you post, and a button appears to quote it. As I’ve done here, on my phone.

Edit: scratch that, something went wrong. I’ll try again.

I get cut or copy or share after I highlight and no keyboard…

Tried with this again …and nothing from the “site” either. I get the “quotes” when I do someone else’s but not my own

Ok … when I’m not in “edit” mode it shows… goddamn technology… just gotta figure out how to make it “stick”

Oh well - no biggie…I just can’t get as fancy as the rest of you smarty pants- but “fancy” isn’t the way I naturally roll :nerd_face:. I HAVE EMOJIS!!!

Ok, hopefully it’s worked this time.