They concern two different things. Yahweh is a proposed provisional assumption relative to the modal. God or Godel’s “god-like” being is a modal truth. One concerns deity. The other concerns God.
Both unevidenced.
Oh mama, are there are Orks and Elf’s in this fantasy of yours?
Not again, address what you quoted please. This is not a pulpit for you to preach from.
I never said that, straw man.
Address the answer or don’t, but it addressed your request honestly, even if you lack the integrity to reciprocate.
1 Like
(1) That’s a provisional unevidenced assumption. (2) God is a proposed modal axiom, not a provisional axiom. Modal axioms and provisional axioms are demonstrated in different ways.
Please be specific. Vagueness isn’t going to help the conversation.
So you admit that there are essential truths and that these truths are of higher order?
When someone talks about demonstrating or proving an axiom, it is time to run away.
2 Likes
You quoted my post, then ignored what it said, only to respond with an irrelevant preaching non-sequitur. Go back, use the link, address what I said, or don’t, just don’t pretend you’re honestly addressing what I said. It’s beyond tedious, and you keep doing it.
Well there you go, rank dishonesty, followed by a repetition of the same.
Do please stop telling others what they think, what they should think, what they must think, and try thinking a little harder yourself. Your dishonest strident preaching is tedious.
And the argument you cited is generally considered to have failed, you disagree, good for you, next.
2 Likes
Absolutely. Many Christians don’t seem to comprehend that preaching is not debating. They sorely confuse the two.
1 Like
This guy is not, strictly speaking, and probably by self-identification, a Christian. So it seems theists in general have this problem. And it’s no surprise, because when they won’t, and can’t, evidence their claims, hectoring is all they have left.
1 Like
The hilarious irony of that statement is off the charts. Just to be clear, Kevin, I’m not laughing at you for saying it. I’m laughing at whatever idiot “government bureaucrat” came up with that statement. “A FLAMEthrower is not a FIREarm.” Ahhhh…. Such is the warped mentality of our government officials. With people like that at the helm, what could possibly go wrong? And people wonder why our system is so fucked up. 
Hey, look on the “bright” side. Anybody with the mentality that believes they absolutely NEED one of those things is more likely to toast himself with it rather than anybody else. (Yes, I used “himself” on purpose, because most females are smart enough to know how ridiculous it would be to own one of those things.)
3 Likes
