Are you claiming to know this? Only if you are it seems innately contradictory, if not then one could claim literally anything based on subjective bias, which is all you appear to have to offer, or can you demonstrate anything approaching objective evidence to support your claims and beliefs?
Where is the value in indulging in speculation about the hypothetical characteristics of unevidenced imaginary deities?
Those are not mutually exclusive positions thus one can believe neither both or either one. FYI atheism is not a belief, it is the lack or absence of belief.
Gibberish, one need not say no to a claim in order to disbelieve it. This is very poor reasoning, though this attempt to reverse the burden of proof, so to speak, seems to be very popular among theistic apologetics.
On what exactly?