WHAT do you mean by that?
Also I should note they chose to become a tax exempt religion in order to oppose other religions on more fair legal grounds. They have opposed the construction of Christian monuments on government property.
Hell they paid for a metal statue of baphomet so they could offer a religious monument to put next to a Ten Commandments statue on local government grounds in Oklahoma. They didnāt want the Ten Commandments removed, they wanted an equal display of religions to show the government wasnāt biased toward one religion.
Look it up, itās a very very clever move. Oklahoma ended up just removing the Ten Commandments rather than display both monuments if I heard correctly. They didnāt want to risk a legal fight to explain why they favored one religion over another, I.E. separation of church and state.
Some Satanists: The Church of Satan is a movement similar to āThe Flying Spaghetti Monster.ā No one believes it to be real. The organization does have tenants and a philosophy of life. LaVeyan Satanism is atheistic. According to LaVey, neither God nor Satan are actual beings; the only āgodā in LaVeyan Satanism is the Satanist himself. Instead, Satan is a symbol representing the qualities embraced by Satanists.
It means whatever YOU want it to mean, just as long as it does not mean what I DONāT want it to mean. Know what I mean?
And just so we are imperfectly clear, it should be glaringly imperceptible that the precise inaccuracy of the ambiguous exactness of said meaning is a matter of supremely important insignificance. Therefore, it would not behoove you to immediately postpone your procrastinating until such a time when indecisive inactions positively fail to negatively contribute to a preferred meaning for that which the meaning is yet unknown.
In full cognizance, it has come to my apperception that our compatriot Mr. Skriten has located an abode in which his sui generous brand of whimsical wisequackery is regarded with the frolicsome complexion of its intent. Moreover, he has unearthed an ilk of like-minded compatriots, who upon reflections, share his sui generous brand of whimsical wisquackery.
Sure, ok, that was fun.
I provided all the information, links and videos included.
TST is a nontheistic religion. I guess I should have included Non-Theistic Religion in the title of the thread to avoid confusion. (No worship, no god belief, no supernatural beliefs)
Here again is the interview of the founder of this nontheistic religion performed by the ffrf (the freedom from religion foundation) The 2 people that are performing the interview are the founders of ffrf.
No need to watch the video. Make up your own stories. (looool)
You people dont seem to need any proof, are you sure you are atheists ?
The Church of Satan unfortunately is an official religion, The Flying Spaghetti Monster is not officially recognized as a religion.
The Church of Satan believe in magic and identify as an atheistic religion, TST does not believe in magic or the supernatural and identify as a nontheistic religion.
Iām not a fan of the Church of Satan but they were the first atheistic Satanic religion, founded in 1966.
For more accurate info about The Satanic Temple visit: The Satanic Temple - About us - TST
Now I would say this thread is done.
Happy Foruming ā¦or whatever this is.
Ze Nigmar
Scooter,
You need to chill, I did speed once too, it isnāt healthy. Your mother and I will pray for you.
It is a far far better thing I do here than to indulge in blatant self-aggrandizement, demonstrated by sheer invention of a non existent differentiation, for the sole purpose of establishing an illusory superiority.
Well, frankly, I can only speculate on the precision with which you reluctantly supplied definitive interpolation. Since meaning is an invention and/or an attachment with which nefariously motivated analysis is prevented by the circumvention created spontaneously, my speculations not withstanding, I would be inclined to defer judgement and/or identification of any and all pontifications to the contrary.
Yes, not the āsole purpose.ā Hence the allusion to whimsical wise-quackery. After all, there are alternative avenues of self-expression regarded bounteously more simplistic by the mainstream patron of the forums. Oneās discretion in opting for such a tone of conversational dissemination must certainly encompass an endeavor to sound pedantic by pontificating beyond the intellectual dexterity or the assemblage of fellow correspondents or engaging in an act of whimsical wise-quackery. I opt to perceive you, not in the ilk of pedantic pontificators, but rather, as engaged in the jovial discourse of a convivial nature.
Wellā¦since that is clearly an invention of, by, and from an imaginative application of extensive vocabularic indulgences, I cannot in any good conscience honestly debate the intrinsic originality presented in the application of various conversational approaches, largely due to my likely bias and subjectivityā¦
Tedi
With a cursory comprehension of your latest composition, I unconditionally acquiesce to the sentiment and without exaggeration concede to the aforesaid on my part as well. Thus bringing our discourse to an unexpurgated closure.
Yep, thatās about itā¦
That kid kills me every fucking time! āI like turtlesā has been my catch phrase for years.
Somehow that makes the uncanny valley of a zombie even more unsettling.