Morality without God is an Illusion

[Calilasseia]

I’ve just found this. The in tray is full again … full of predictable mythology fanboy garbage.

@Truthseeker

Sorry for my limited time as having a life, family friends after the screen goes black
And for not putting my priority on a website i find interesting recently among many things in my life
But anyways i dont feel offended . And i hope this website widens my perception
And im having fun so far

@Calilasseia

Both your original post and this one are total and utter garbage.

Oh wow lets say my topic is garbage
my topic is morality relies on a basis and standard, to it doesn’t seem theres a source for it. Unless you can prove it (as if you all are living with 100%proof) its still is a mystery

Oh wait, experiments have been conducted, by researchers such as Frans de Waal among others, establishing that we don’t need a cartoon magic man in order to function as ethical beings.

@Truthseeker

And you base your morality as a product of biology and the physical brain but you can never prove it empirically at the end of the day its still an assumption.

Those experiments by Frans de Waal and others I’ve just mentioned above maker a lie out of your above assertion.

@Truthseeker

It may be a genious [sic] assumption but still an assumption

Again, those experiments by Frans de Waal and others destroy your assertion.

@Truthseeker

Because if i crack open your brain do you think i will see thoughts? no it will just be a splashing of your brain

Ah, playground discourse. Which is what I’ve learned to expect from a mythology fanboy.

Guess what, Looby Loo? A fair amount o research has been conducted in the field of cognitive neuroscience, including the little matter of working out what someone has been thinking using fMRI scanning data. The research is admittedly in its infancy, but it’s already yielding some remarkable results. Unlike infantile attachment to Bronze Age “Magic Man did it” fantasies.

@Truthseeker

All these thoughts, believe etc. Are happening meta physically which could not be proved physically

That research by cognitive neuroscientists I just mentioned destroys your assertion.

Indeed, scientists have known for some time that thought is a product of human brain chemistry. But you were too busy wasting your time with a Bronze Age mythology to learn genuine facts.

@Truthseeker

And you are placing your belief (meta physics) on morality to which again you cannot prove its basis for it

I’m really enjoying your failure here, given that I’m aware of experiments in relevant disciplines that destroy your infantile assertions.

@Truthseeker

Looks like someone’s also in a fantasy world where things doesn’t need prove

You mean the fantasy world of being a fanboy of Bronze Age mythology? Yes, that’s a fantasy world all right. Again, I’m enjoying your failure here.

@Truthseeker

Looks like the garbage you talked about is too similar with your reliance system on morality

The only garbage I see on display here is yours. Oh wait, I have evidence to support the postulates I present. Oh wait, I already pointed you at the evidence in question, but it seems you never bothered even to acknowledge the existence of the thread, let alone address the contents thereof.

@Truthseeker

@Calilasseia

But of course, the problem you have, even without that extensive demolition of your canards, is that mythology fanboys like you have never produced even an atom of evidence to support the assertion that your cartoon magic man actually exists.

You demand atom of evidence (Physical) give me an atom of evidence of your believe [sic] in morality

I already did, and in quantity. Going to read that document sometime, and learn something? Let’s see, there’s how many citations in there for relevant peer reviewed scientific research? Oh that’s right, no less than seveneen citations, accompanied by expositions of the papers in question in some detail.

Come back when you can match this level of diligence.

@Truthseeker

Perhaps i could slice your brain and find an atom of evidence regarding how your morality foundation exist

Perhaps I could slice your brain, and discover the complete absence of functioning neurons therein?

Look, I can even play this game better than you, let alone conduct proper discourse better.

@Truthseeker

So far my belief in my magic man and your belief in your morality is looking the same

Those experiments say otherwise. A good many of which are documented in the scientific papers I cited in my exposition here. Try reading that document and learn something.

@Truthseeker

So lets accept that my morality topic is garbage and well your belief in morality is also garbage

No, let’s accept that I have evidence for my postulates, and you have nothing but blind assertions, snide condescension and bluster. Evidence which I provide in detail here, which you didn’t even bother to acknowledge the existence of the first time I presented it to you.

@Truthseeker

@Calilasseia

Worse still, the mythology you treat as fact contains ridiculous assertions that have been utterly destroyed by real world data. Such as the farcical assertion that genetics is purportedly controlled by coloured sticks, which was flushed down the toilet by a 19th century monk, when he taught us how genetics actually operates, and launched modern genetics as a properly constituted scientific discipline

Ohh hold up. I cannot prove why i believe in my magic character through (emperical [sic] evidence) so its a total myth and therefore destroyed by real world data, so im a man living in fairy tales ohh nooo , but wait a minute… You also can’t prove why you believe in your morality standard (a standard that have no backbone) through emperical [sic] evidence therefore destroyed by real world data.

Do I have to keep rubbing your nose in this, like a puppy that’s just pissed on the carpet?

@Truthseeker

So im not the only one dancing in a fairy tale story

Yes you are. Once again, going to bother READING any of this?

@Truthseeker

@Calilasseia

Don’t waste mine or anyone else’s time here, until you’ve examined that document I provided in full, and learned some facts.

Facts? Your topic is on Ethics which is literally morality…
Facts mean things that are proved to be true
You sure you can prove your morality standard is valid?

How often do I have to keep rubbing your nose in this, mythology fanboy?

@Truthseeker

As far as im concerned you are making a fantasy claim that you proved meta - physics physically

How often do I have to keep rubbing your nose in this, mythology fanboy?

Oh, and do learn basic spelling and grammar, only I keep seeing incompetence in these fields from your ilk. Which makes my task of humiliating you before a global public audience all the easier.