Premise 1 is based on inductive reasoning on examples occurring within the temporal state of the material universe, and even that can’t be taken as an absolute, else we could rule out miracles with the same reasoning.
Worse still, Craig then unashamedly tries to apply this shaky rule he’s created to a non temporal state before the big bang, and before the material universe exists. Shoddy doesn’t even begin to describe this, and he’s a professional philosopher?
Ahem, premise 1 being violated like a drag queen at a tractor pull, with more known logical fallacies than a Witch doctors training course. He ought to be embarrassed.
More assumptions, and the usual dearth of evidence, and all in his sickeningly pompous and unabashed theistic style. I long ago came to realise Lane Craig is not to be taken seriously.