No, you haven’t missed anything Hero.
What you experience following Dr Craig’s ‘logic’ is what every other sane person experiences, that sense that one has fallen into a worm hole, jumped forward in time, and missed that salient bit where Craig explains the existence of a god in the first place.
I distrust arguments that rely on too many ‘ifs’.
Craig has proved his lack of intellectual integrity and disabuse of truth in his interview where he admits that if presented with utterly undeniable incontestable evidence, if that evidence contradicted his preferred scripture, he would shaft the evidence and run with scripture.
I recall another discussion/debate in which he insisted that all the little children recorded in Deuteronomy as having had their brains dashed out or being killed in the Jewish Lebensraum Genocide of Canaan were not killed on the orders of a cruel inhuman ‘God’, because their little souls were taken to heaven as they had committed no sin. If ever he looked like a complete psychopath, the self satisfied look on his face when he made that announcement proved to me he was quietly insane and could quite calmly justify any horrific monstrosity or act.
But Dr. Craig is not alone in all this. I am currently detailing, in my own amateurish manner, Professor Behe’s testimony from Kitzmiller vs Dover and the Professor’s insistence that his ‘intelligent design’ and 'irreducible complexity ’ are legitimate examples of the scientific method because they are based on evidence of observation (it sure looks like it was designed) and application of inductive reasoning (…so…therefore?..it’s a god!) reeks of the same deluded nonsense that Craig demonstrates.
In the theist mind ‘God’ simply exists before anything else can be
discussed and all arguments and evidence that prove the existence of that ‘God’ are already established as a priority. This stance doesn’t lead to truth but it certainly does save a lot of time.
Later in the trial under cross examination Behe displays the same blinkered attitude of Craig when he arrogantly denies even the existence of any scientific literature that contradicts his pet beliefs. Then when Rothschild presented him with stacks of books and papers written in direct response to his claims and those of creationism generally, he merely discounted them all as being incorrect and at the very least, ‘insufficient’.
I think at this point Judge Jones (a Christian) might have already decided that creationism/intelligent design/irreducible complexity were not science and quietly that Behe was as deluded as Craig, but that’s just my call.
But Hero, back to more important issues with your OP…are you really saying in all seriousness that you don’t beleive in INVISIBLE COSMIC DONKEYSSS?!! Man, you really have missed something here!