It’s the same false equivalence fallacy he’s been using from the first. Occam’s razor applies, plus he has already admitted he doesn’t know how a deity is possible, doesn’t know where this deity he imagines is real came from, can’t offer one word of explanation as to how the supernatural power is possible, can’t explain where the power to create a universe comes from, or offer one word of explanation beyond facile assertion to explain how he imagines a deity use supernatural powers to create the universe
Alongside these assertions:
That’s pretty hilarious, you must admit.