Liar…
So that’s two for two champ, you’re consistent, I will give you that, but you’re also a liar. Fire extinguisher needed here stat, we have a serious pants fire going on!!
Uncanny knack you have for being wrong, but in most courts people invoke a god in an oath to give truthful testimony, before they are allowed to testify.
Hmm… Fire extinguisher needed here stat, we have a serious pants fire going on!!
Your hubris catching you out again, and you can’t say I haven’t consistently warned you to rein in that hubris.
That is precisely the kind of ludicrous hyperbole you have also been warned against as well, you cannot possibly know what evidence may or may not be uncovered in the future.
There is nothing in the definition that mentions or implies a brain is required, outside of a human context of course, and we are not discussing humans, so in this context the word seems apropos for a plant detecting light, and moving towards it, though no one is claiming a plant is has consciousness of course, well almost no one, and certainly not in the sense a human is. However you used a sweeping piece of hyperbole, and claimed “evolution **proves it doesn’t exist”, it’s quoted above. The link from @Cognostic was compelling evidence that plants subjectively experience light, through photoreceptors, which are capable of transmitting those signals into a light-signaling response cascade.
Hubris, and very very misplaced again.
More ludicrous hyperbole.
You might want to stick a comma in that sentence, as the irony is going cause some sort of world shortage. You really are an utterly charmless individual aren’t you.