I guess this depends whether you are talking about what science describes, or the description itself, as I’d say humans created the latter using the methods of science, but that what they are describing is objectively real.
A common false equivalence fallacy theists and apologists use, is to conflate the descriptive with the proscriptive. Laws need a law giver for example, a circular reasoning fallacy of course, but the laws are human creations, they don’t exist independently of humans, what they describe does though.