Oh look, it’s this garbage yet again.
“Intelligent design” is a fraudulent concoction conjured up iby American corporate creationists, in a failed attempt to push fundamentalist Christian religious mythology into American science classes in violation of the Establishment Clause, and was exposed as such at the Dover Trial. And, as a corollary of that origin, employs all the usual duplicitous elisions and fabrications that I covered in depth in this thread specifically devoted to the duplicity inherent in “design” apologetics, which at bottom, is all that “design” fetishists have to offer – apologetics.
Indeed, I’ve never encountered a mythology fanboy who understands what steps are required to be taken, and what results are required to be obtained successfully, in order to convert the “design” assertion into something other than a product of the rectal passage. But, even if these steps were successfully undertaken, those steps would not provide any clues whatsoever to the nature of whatever “designer” was responsible - possible the only piece of “intelligent design” propaganda that bears some connection to reality.
Indeed, no matter how successfully those steps were performed, and “design” was detected in relevant classes of entities and interactions, this still wouldn’t validate the existence of a cartoon magic man from a Bronze Age mythology, because that is a separate issue. Furthermore, this separate issue is again totally devoid of genuine evidence supporting the requisite assertion, and no, “my favourite Bronze Age mythology says so” doesn’t count as “evidence” for anything other than the propensity of the authors thereof to make shit up.
Oh, and William Dembski tried the “let’s fabricate some fake mathematics” approach to try and validate his religious predilection for “design”, and failed. It only took him 12 years to realise that the exercise was futile, despite being schooled by genuine mathematicians on the subject.