Oh fuck, This was addressed yesterday and the asshole is still repeating the same bullshit. How long do we have to put up with this nonsense?
I’ve already said what I needed to say, but he keeps going about the same crap in the hopes several of us will change our answer and agree with him which is an Argument by Repetition fallacy.
Weak, I REALLY had high hopes here.
Cog, you don’t have to put up with any of it. I, however, am interested in getting my questions answered so will continue to prod him.
I am proposing the formula for collating the reliable ontology, and the general categories, thereof. I cannot determine all of the subcategories - way too many calculations in way too many subject areas that I am not familiar or interested in deliberating.
I have no formal credentials in library science, which would be the most likely scholarly discipline. I am able to soundly explain and classify entities because of my extensive research and exercise of the collation formula that I was able to detect upon initial research and ambition to construct a “scientific” classification system.
I am not intent on asking the common folks to trust me. I am intent on challenging all fields of scientists to seek to construct a reliable ontology, because that is what humanity needs. To that I am offering my incomplete classification system as the starting point.
The general categories of my classification system is much easier to memorize than the Dewey Decimal or Library of Congress classification systems, and that is a really good starting point.
Are you going to just continue to just PM me “fuck you, bitch” or do you intend to engage with the group and actually articulate your ideas?
Oh I do so love it when they have an ego this big. I don’t think you’ll find much love from us “common folks” here. Just a little dash of fascist there, mmm mmmm good. I love it.
He actually sent you a message saying that? Wow. He’s an even bigger douche bag than I thought.
Twice now, think I might have touched a nerve somewhere in there. Didn’t seem to like my assessment of his response as weak lol. Snowflake
In other words…you have bupkus.
How you have answered me provides nothing that I find worthy of trust in your ability to provision that which you claim you can/have/will.
Then why are you in the A.R. Debate Forum going on and on about your solutions?
Have you any formal credentials in anything?
Well, that gives me a lot of confidence in his higher order thinking…NOT.
Have any of the scientists you prefer presenting your ideas to, as opposed to common folk, taken you up on this?
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST, this clown is certainly full of shit(himself). I prefer to remain one of the “common folks” than sound like an arrogant asshole, which you seem to be very good at.
You can’t fix stupid apparently.
Well, there’s me blocking him. Comedy show over.
This guy is a genius in his own mind apparently.
Too bad the mods didn’t keep him blocked either. He’s been nothing but a headache.
This is why I can’t make friends