How to refute the Sagan Standard in the case of the existence of God?

[Sheldon]

@Druso

Scientific skepticism is essential for questioning dogmas, validating hypotheses, and avoiding hasty conclusions. It promotes intellectual humility, recognizing the limits of knowledge and the need for evidence.

Did you have a point?

@Druso

For atheists, who often reject unproven supernatural explanations, this rigor is crucial.

Nope, all I require for disbelief is that a claim is unsupported by any objective evidence.

@Druso

science does not answer all human questions,

Straw man fallacy.

@Druso

such as the meaning of life

Begging the question fallacy, why do you assume that life has overarching meaning, beyond what we subjectively attach to it?

@Druso

subjective ethics,

Why would a methodology like science, designed to remove as much subjective bias as possible, validate a subjective metaethical philosophy?

@Sheldon

Now if that is not @Druso’s criteria for disbelief, then what is, one wonders? This might help us move things along, along with his reason for believing a deity exists or is possible, as I asked already, which deity does he believe exists, and why?

You seem to have repeated the same fallacious arguments, while avoiding addressing any of my questions, hmm…