Dear oh dear…you’ve offered no objective morality, so what on earth are you talking about? You’re repeating the same subjective opinion over and over, it’s right there underlined and emboldened, only sufficient objective evidence can demonstrate this, and you have offered nothing.
That’s just the same subjective opinion you keep repeating over and over?, Your deity is depicted in your bible committing an act of global genocide, so either that was immoral, or it is not a moral absolute, which is it?
What moral law, humans create their morals subjectively, and create laws to enforce them subjectively, this does not make them objective morals, why would it?
Wow, do you really imagine the speed limits exist independently of human opinions?
No they don’t, since a) they are themselves examples of subjective opinions like speed limits, and b) there is no evidence the Nazis lacked morality, merely that their subjective morality differed from our subjective morality.
That doesn’t make the law itself objective, only your violation of the subjective law is an objective fact. If you claim murder is immoral that is a subjective claim, if I murder someone and it is demonstrated with sufficient objective evidence, then it is an objective fact I committed murder, it is not an objective fact murder is immoral.
I have demonstrated several known logical fallacies you have used, you have ignored them completely, so please don’t lie and pretend your claims are rational when they demonstrably are not. You used a no true Scotsman fallacy above, and you have used an argumentum ad populum fallacy several times, and these have been explained, you don’t just get to skip passed these without any honest response, and then pretend your claims are rational.
Indeed not, and your claim that torturing children, and genocide are objective moral absolutes, contradicts your claim it is just or moral for a deity to set these aside arbitrarily, and commit genocide and torture children. This violates a basic principle of logic, as I explained above it violates the law of non contradiction, I even linked an explanation, and you simply ignored this.
No, that is not how logic works, and your first steps are equally as irrationally as I have demonstrated. You have failed to offer a single example of absolute morality, you have failed to offer rational arguments, and you keep repeating your subjective opinion that genocide is immoral as if tacking the word objective onto it changes this somehow?
You just ignored this, and my previous post, and simply repeated your previous subjective claims???