Uh…whilst I can reluctantly muster a definitely indeterminate argumentative affirmation of your vaguely specific analysis, I am impelled to
succinctly remind you of the model from which our confrere was created. The public identifying of this model has been known to illicit a hysterical and frantic reaction in some mechanical contrivances, therefore I will only elucidate that the model was a story, and later a movie with a “Mel Gibson” in the lead role. The veracity of my reluctantly revealed information can be verified by the documentation concerning the prior employment positions held by our generally amicable, yet sometimes vainglorious, comrade. The required transmutation was
effected by arguably meretricious means, however the resultant consequence is manifested in the personage of the prattler in question. Any further intimate enlightenment will not be forthcoming.
Edit to avoid compunction