Well the purpose of the forum is debate, why would anyone be obliged to stop debating? You are of course free to respond or not as you see fit, as am I.
You claimed that I kept misrepresenting you, I asked you for one single example as it was untrue, you failed to evidence the claim with a single example, QED.
You’re kidding right? Seriously you are the one who has from the start and relentlessly made this personal, you even said you’d prefer to exchange insults than address my posts on the topic. While I have tried to stay on topic, so that accusation is simply hilarious.
It’s a debate, only you wanted a fight, and again you don’t get to tell me when or what I can post. You seem to be playing some sort of game now, with false accusations of trolling.
You started the thread, so it’s bizarre to claim not to want to debate it, and you were the one who started the personal attacks yet again, so this talk of low blows is just absurd, you even said unequivocally that’s what you preferred when I warned you to desist at the start. Now you want to try and play the victim, all I have tried to do is debate the topic and the claims you made.
More personal insults, and who is winning what? This is a debate, one may sway others with compelling arguments, or by presenting sufficient objective evidence, beyond that there is no winning that I am aware of.
I have seen no objective evidence that consciousness exists independently as “space in the brain” as you claimed, nor that it might be indestructible, again as you claimed, the idea it is immaterial has also not been objectively evidenced, the only argument you have offered seems inconsistent as it had you claiming an itch was immaterial as it couldn’t be weighed, but you failed to explain how something immaterial could be physically scratched, as just one example of why I didn’t find that argument at all compelling.