Couldn’t it also be a false equivalence fallacy, where non-belief based on missing data is surreptitiously replaced with/reinterpreted as being secretly angry with a god that has been axiomatically assumed to exist?
Couldn’t it also be a false equivalence fallacy, where non-belief based on missing data is surreptitiously replaced with/reinterpreted as being secretly angry with a god that has been axiomatically assumed to exist?