I mentioned 2 mistakes that theists make and there are really at least 3. The third is that they tend to conflate relativism (absolute vs relative truth) with objective vs subjective reality. They want to think that some how us saying that morality is subjective is the same as saying that we are a relativist. The problem at the core of this is that a definition cannot be true or better on its own. How we define green isn’t truer or better than the way we define blue. Just like if I define murder one way, and you define it another way, neither of those are more true or better on its own. Something is only true when those definitions are compared against something they are meant to describe and they match. Better can be argued to the end of time. Usefulness is a more important quality as described above since us all having similar or the same definitions allow us to communicate.
Even if you have some god say that this is their preferred definition for something, it doesn’t make it better or more true. All they can do is try to enforce it through some kind of extortion. They would still be bound by the fact that it is inherently subjective.
From my personal experience, people who make this argument don’t understand basic philosophy, because even if their misunderstanding was correct, it would still take a logical fallacy to jump to their invisible friend being real.
@WhoAreYou still has not responded…