Wrong.
Quite simply, the more rabid mythology fanboys regard ANY critique of their mythologies and their cartoon magic men, no matter how robustly grounded in real world data said critiques are, as “blasphemy”, and some of the nastier ones are willing to kill anyone who doesn’t genuflect before their vicious doctrines. We’ve observed a telling instance just 72 hours ago, of the mentality involved, featuring a young girl being brutally murdered, then incinerated, by a rabid mob of Islamic mythology fanboys in Nigeria. Which, sadly, is now a country infected with venomous brands of mythology fanboyism, whose adherents are doing everything they can to propel that country back to the Stone Age,
Quite simply, “blasphemy” is an invented offence against an invented cartoon magic man, intended to shut down debate and enforce conformity to doctrine. It’s a duplicitous tool of political control, that belongs in the dustbin of history. It was used in the past as a pretext for murdering people who dared to utter eminently reasonable statements in public, that didn’t conform to the wishes of the murderous mythology fanboys in question. Giordano Bruno provides the canonical example - he was barbecued by mythology fanboy psychopaths, for proposing the entirely reasonable hypothesis that the distant stars possessed planets orbiting around them, a hypothesis that has since been established to be correct via observation with space based telescopes.
Wrong. See above.
Mythology fanboys have also used “blasphemy” to try and destroy scientific inquiry. See above.
Again, see above.
Ahem, pointing out the manifest absurdities and iniquities endemic to mythology fanboyism, IS logical and reasonable. Except that again, the mythology fanboys have a habit of breaking out the “blasphemy” mantra whenever such critique is offered.
Even when we do, the mythology fanboys resort to mischief such as fatuous accusations of “blasphemy”. Quite simply, my response to this is “fuck that”.