You could learn what a common logical fallacy is, recognise you have used them relentlessly in your posts. Or you could convince us all to abandon logic, and start regarding the word as rhetoric, as so many religious apologists seem to on here. I have to say, I can’t speak for anyone else of course, but I don’t see me accepting demonstrably irrational arguments, even if you keep falsely asserting they are rational.
That’s not what is happening, generally you are making poorly evidenced claims, and offering irrational arguments, and others are disbelieving them.
Where did your deity come from, odd how you think you cannot ignore this special pleading fallacy, but nonetheless there it is.
Where did your deity come from?
And around and around we go…
It would be if any atheists here had assumed that, but they have not, they’re just keeping an open mind, and are not prepared to rule anything out based on your biased claims, posited in order to insert a deity you neither evidence or explain.
I’m pretty sure he was being ironic, by parodying your reasoning, though your response is even more ironic of course.
Ding ding ding, we have a winner.
Oh oh oh me me me, I know this one…NO he hasn’t noticed, what do I win?
One more hint then, you’re not discussing anything, you’re peddling your superstitious wares, to an audience that is able to submit your snake oil to proper critical scrutiny, and has found it wanting. What you need is a pulpit or a revival tent meeting, now there’s the kind of captive unquestioning audience you want.
Since this is a public debate forum, then others will comment on your posts as and when they are minded to. Though of course you are not obliged to post here, if rational and critical scrutiny is something you’d rather your subjective religious beliefs be spared. I am sure we’d all understand.