On the contrary, you made two contradictory claims:
You also lied, asserting you had not made the first claim here:
That’s a lie, all you’d need to do is explain how you know we must have an initial belief before we can develop new beliefs, when you admit you don’t know where that initial belief comes from. That initial belief would be a counterexample that destroys your assertion, since you admit you don’t know where it comes from. All the rest is smoke and mirrors from you.
I presented an irrefutable lie you’d told.
There it is again for everyone to see. Irrational Ad hominem doesn’t frighten me, though it’s hard not to see hurling ad hominem to avoid addressing your lie as anything but cowardly.
Another lie…though you may want to delete that ad hominem. It’s pretty dishonest and cowardly to try and hide it behind a faux question as well.