You didn’t heed my warning so a timely reminder of why I am asking you to show some integrity and answer a question I first asked of you 6 months ago:
Then you should be able to do better than that argumentum ad populum fallacy, and give a few reasons you claim there are, but you can’t can you, the obvious inference is because it was dishonest vapid rhetoric.
Except this is not about interpretation at all, it’s about you making a claim, that “there are good reasons to regard the Biblical cannon (and perhaps some extra canonical works too) as being - to some degree - supernaturally originated.” Then refusing to give even one example to support your claim for six months, and then lecturing another poster for not answering one question asked an hour or so previously in a sententious baiting manner.
Now do you have the integrity to offer any examples, or admit it pure rhetoric?
Oh I think I am happy for anyone to read your spiel here and decide for themselves on that one, as it is manifestly true.
I think we can add superstition the growing list of words that don’t mean what you think they do, or by all means quote a single example of me peddling superstition.
Which part of the claim do you need explained? Which words are tripping you up?
I already offered a very expansive answer on this, and you ignored that answer, quelle surprise. What’s worse you’re now lying that no one has answered, your duplicity is becoming tedious now. Go and find it, as i am done catering to your petulant demands everyone answer you while you dishonestly evade questions ptu to you.
Quote even a single example of me peddling superstition, I dare you, but if you will take a little advice you will Google the word first, as I am pretty sure this is another word that doesn’t mean what you think it does based on that hilarious lie. Here’s a clue I don’t believe the supernatural is possible, so why would I try and peddle it to others, you’ve lost the plot here it seems.