That position is not atheism. Though it is atheistic, and a person holding it would be an atheist. As I have said three times now, the dictionary defines atheism as the lack or absence of belief in any deity or deities, this is not a claim about deities or religions.
What has this to do with you conflating theistic belief, with how organised religions conduct themselves, to misrepresent what Cyber said above, about someone believing in god not breaking her legs or picking her pockets?
How is this relevant? Your tangential segue into Buddhism is a rabbit hole too far for me. You’ve gone from conflating belief in a deity with how organised religions conduct themselves, to Buddhism, I am starting to get dizzy at the way you’re changing your original claim and the context.
You said atheism was a claim no deities exist, and now you’re quoting Wikipedia stating plainly that the broadest definition makes no such claim, do you really not see the problem? If you had said some atheists believe or claim, that there is no god, that would be fine, but that is not what you said is it?