Firstly the gospels are anonymous hearsay, we have not one contemporary word written about anything Jesus may or may not have said or done. The names Mathew Mark Luke and John were assigned arbitrarily to the gospel texts three and half centuries later, to lend them some gravitas.
There are multiple responses, read them.
What evidence? This is that person’s subjective opinion, based on his subjective religious beliefs, it is the very definition of an appeal to authority fallacy. Do you really imagine a jury can weigh supernatural claims based on anonymous hearsay written thousands of years ago, decades after the events it purports to describe, from an epoch of extreme ignorance and superstition?
Yet you have posted without reading any of them?
Exactly, the evidence is scant at best that the character Jesus described in the anonymous hearsay of the gospels existed at all.
Again this is a fact, there is no more evidence for the claims contained within the anonymous hearsay of the gospels, than there is to support the Legends of Hercules.